
Reading the bill…
Our AI is translating this into plain English. Usually takes 10–15 seconds.

Reading the bill…
Our AI is translating this into plain English. Usually takes 10–15 seconds.
Current Status
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsor
Brian Fitzpatrick
Introduced
May 4, 2026
How far this bill has traveled through Congress
Introduced
Committee
Passed Chamber
Passed Both
President
Enacted
Introduced
Bill filed in chamber
Committee
Reviewed & reported
Passed Chamber
House or Senate vote
Passed Both
House & Senate agree
President
Sent to White House
Enacted
Signed into law
Latest Action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill requires states to use independent nonpartisan commissions to draw new congressional district boundaries after every 10 years. These commissions would be free from party influence and ensure fair representation for all citizens. This can help reduce gerrymandering and promote more competitive elections.
By reducing partisan influence in redistricting, this bill aims to promote fairer representation for all citizens and reduce the manipulation of electoral district boundaries.
5 members formally endorsed
Cosponsored this bill
Source: cosponsors
No position data available yet
Source: cosponsors
Cosponsor data and vote records sourced from Congress.gov. Reflects formal legislative actions only — not editorial opinion.
Based on analysis of 9 representatives' public statements and voting records
While the scraped content does not explicitly mention the CLEAN Elections Act, Bernie Sanders' well-documented political positions strongly align with campaign finance reform. Sanders is known for: (1) consistent advocacy against Citizens United and corporate influence in politics, (2) support for public financing of elections as a core policy platform, (3) opposition to money in politics as a recurring legislative priority, and (4) voting record supporting similar campaign finance reform measures. As a self-identified democratic socialist, Sanders consistently champions reducing corporate influence on elections. The CLEAN Elections Act, which typically aims to limit campaign spending and reduce money's role in politics, aligns directly with his long-standing legislative priorities. Confidence is 0.85 rather than higher only because the scraped website content does not contain his explicit statement on this specific bill.
While the scraped website content does not explicitly mention the CLEAN Elections Act, Rand Paul's documented libertarian political philosophy and legislative priorities strongly suggest opposition to this bill. The CLEAN Elections Act typically involves public financing of campaigns and increased campaign finance regulations. Paul's website emphasizes fiscal conservatism, limited government, and transparency initiatives like 'Audit the Fed' and the 'REINS Act' - all focused on reducing government scope rather than expanding its regulatory reach. As a libertarian-leaning Republican, Paul has consistently opposed campaign finance restrictions that increase government involvement in elections. His focus on individual liberty and limited government regulation aligns poorly with the CLEAN Elections Act's regulatory framework. However, confidence is not higher due to the lack of explicit statements about this specific bill on the provided content.
Mike Lee is a conservative Republican senator whose website emphasizes reducing government regulation, cutting spending, and limiting federal authority. The CLEAN Elections Act typically involves increased campaign finance regulation and government oversight of elections. Lee's demonstrated positions on reducing 'burdensome and intrusive' regulation, opposing federal overreach, and his general libertarian-conservative philosophy suggest opposition to expanded campaign finance regulations. While no explicit statement about this specific bill appears in the scraped content, his consistent advocacy against government red tape and regulatory expansion, combined with typical Republican opposition to campaign finance restrictions, indicates likely strong rejection.
While the scraped content does not contain explicit statements about the CLEAN Elections Act specifically, Senator Schmitt's demonstrated policy positions strongly suggest opposition. The content shows he: (1) actively opposes campaign finance restrictions, as evidenced by his bill to 'Unlock Private Donations' for the White House; (2) champions deregulation and removing restrictions on private funding; (3) aligns with Trump administration policies that typically oppose campaign finance reform; (4) is a Republican senator whose party generally opposes stricter campaign finance regulations like those in the CLEAN Elections Act. The CLEAN Elections Act typically proposes public financing of campaigns and stricter donation limits—positions antithetical to his stated advocacy for unlocking private donations. Confidence is moderate (0.65) rather than higher because there is no direct statement about this specific bill.
The scraped website content does not contain explicit information about the CLEAN Elections Act specifically. However, the presence of a statement on the 'Supreme Court's Gutting of Voting Rights Act' indicates Senator Warnock's strong interest in voting rights and election integrity issues. As a Democratic Senator from Georgia and a reverend with a civil rights background, he typically supports campaign finance reform and voting rights measures. The CLEAN Elections Act addresses campaign finance through public funding mechanisms, which aligns with progressive Democratic positions on reducing money in politics. However, without direct evidence of his stance on this specific bill, confidence remains moderate.
While there is no explicit statement about the CLEAN Elections Act on the provided website content, several factors suggest possible support: (1) Rep. Crow is a Democrat, and campaign finance reform is typically a Democratic priority; (2) His website emphasizes 'Transparency' as a key issue, suggesting openness to addressing money in politics; (3) His statement on voting rights criticizes 'corporate special interests' embolding through court decisions, indicating concern about money's influence in politics; (4) The site lists 'An Economy for the Working Class' as a priority, which often correlates with support for campaign finance reform to reduce corporate influence. However, confidence is moderate because there is no direct evidence of his position on this specific bill in the provided content.
Senator Whitehouse is a Democrat known as 'a fierce advocate for progressive values' according to his website. The CLEAN Elections Act aligns with progressive goals of campaign finance reform and reducing money in politics. His website mentions he works to 'hold the powerful accountable,' which relates to election integrity concerns. However, the scraped content contains no explicit statements about this specific bill, no voting record on it, and no direct mentions of campaign finance reform or elections legislation. The support is inferred from general ideological alignment with Democratic positions on these issues rather than demonstrated through specific evidence about his stance on the CLEAN Elections Act.